Skip to main content
PandaCodeGen
SEO-safe migrations · Fixed scope · Documented handover

Outgrown WordPress, Wix or Webflow? Move to a site built for the way AI picks its answers.

We move you off WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, Webflow or GoHighLevel onto custom Next.js you own outright, without losing the traffic you already have. Your pages load fast and put a clear answer where ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI can find it and quote you.

Our own pages are cited in Google's AI Overviews. Custom code you own outright, built to 90+ PageSpeed, fixed pricing from $1,500.

See our work
Start here

Have a project or a question in mind?

We are here to help. Share your website, or anything about it you would like to discuss, and a founder will reply. Every message gets an answer, whether or not it ever turns into a quote.

Prefer to talk instead?

Email us or book a call. Both reach the founders directly, not a sales desk.

Just exploring? Run a free technical scan of your site first.

PandaCodeGen is a custom Next.js web development studio that rebuilds slow WordPress, Shopify, Webflow, Wix and Squarespace sites into fast custom code the client owns outright. Builds start at $1,500 with fixed pricing for the written scope, carry a 90+ Lighthouse handover target on mobile and desktop verified across three recorded runs, and have no monthly platform fees. Pages arrive as finished HTML with clear, direct answers that search engines and AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity can quote.

The migration standard

The rebuild is new. The critical paths stay accounted for.

Before we switch anything over, we write down what has to survive the move and how we will check each one. That is what we mean by SEO-safe: controls on the risk, not a promise about rankings.

Review our migration standard

Migration continuity ledger

The handover view for systems that cannot disappear during a rebuild.

Defined before launch
  • ContinuitySearch continuity
    Control surfaceURLs, canonicals, and indexable content
    Client-readable evidenceInventory + redirect specification
  • ContinuityRevenue continuity
    Control surfaceForms, checkout paths, and integrations
    Client-readable evidenceStaged end-to-end test log
  • ContinuityMeasurement continuity
    Control surfaceAnalytics, consent, and conversion events
    Client-readable evidenceBaseline + event QA record
  • ContinuityOperating continuity
    Control surfaceDNS, launch owners, monitoring, and rollback
    Client-readable evidenceOwnered launch runbook
This is an example of the structure. Your signed scope names the actual systems, the checks, who owns each, and what evidence you sign off against.

Custom Next.js and commerce work remains available when the migration requires it.

What is included, what is not, how you sign it off, who owns it, and who does what at launch. All in writing.

Evidence, not theater

Client words with a source you can open.

No stock portraits, rotating star theatre, or anonymous outcome claims. These are short excerpts from public review pages, linked so you can read the full context yourself.

Featured in

Woman’s World (opens in a new tab) quoted co-founder Hassan Jamal as an AI expert on remote AI-training work.

Client delivery

22 days

MyCustomPatches project delivery

Owner-confirmed project record, recorded July 21, 2026.

Hassan was available to me at any time, and his response time was always less than an hour.
Verified Clutch review (opens in a new tab)March 2026
Hassan was super helpful and communicative throughout the process.
Marshall James on Trustpilot (opens in a new tab)March 2026
They worked with me to make a website that I could afford.
James Peace on Trustpilot (opens in a new tab)March 2026

Founder-affiliated, clearly labelled

Panda Patches is owned by a PandaCodeGen co-founder.

We built its platform but hold no ownership stake. It is presented as operating experience, not as an independent client endorsement.

See the project records

Decision controls

Make the commercial assumptions visible.

A custom build is not automatically cheaper, faster, or more appropriate than a managed platform. The useful comparison is the documented scope, operating model, risk, and measurement method for this site.

01

Inventory before architecture

Review URLs, content, CMS models, forms, integrations, analytics, accessibility needs, stakeholders, and cutover constraints before selecting a stack.

02

Compare total cost

Document current and proposed platform, app, hosting, database, email, observability, payment, support, and migration costs using dated provider prices and usage assumptions.

03

Accept against written evidence

Put deliverables, exclusions, test conditions, ownership, licensing, change control, warranty, support, remedies, and handover into the proposal.

Our Expertise

Migrations engineered around what can break.

URL inventory · Redirect mapping

Migrations & New Builds

We list every page, every piece of content, your analytics, your forms and everything they connect to before we build anything. Then we test the switchover against criteria you signed off.

Custom Engineering

SaaS dashboards, internal tools, and AI integrations. When “off-the-shelf” isn't enough, we build exactly what you need.

Scoped separately

Product and internal-tool work starts with how it should be built, what data it holds, how it stays secure, what it connects to and what it will cost to run. Not a generic website package.

View Architecture

Search & AI Foundations

Pages a crawler can read, a business described the same way everywhere, structured data that matches what visitors see, and claims backed by a source. We cannot guarantee a citation.

Review delivery standards

Faster E-commerce

Headless Shopify and WooCommerce storefronts, when you have measured that the theme or an integration is genuinely the limit. Keep the commerce backend where it remains the right fit.

See e-commerce

Not sure where to start?

Tell us what you're building or what's slowing you down. We'll give you a straight answer. No pitch, no pressure.

Who we help

Start with the situation.

These are common starting conditions. We investigate the closest match before recommending a build, migration, or integration.

Starting condition

Paid-media reporting does not reconcile with observed enquiries or sales.

Audit browser and server events, consent, attribution boundaries, and platform diagnostics before proposing tracking changes.

Starting condition

Customers leave somewhere between product discovery and completed checkout.

Measure page performance and the checkout path, identify supported causes, and scope only the changes the evidence justifies.

Starting condition

An agency needs engineering capacity with clear roles and accountable communication.

Document delivery roles, branding, confidentiality, approvals, timing assumptions, and commercial terms in the partner agreement.

Starting condition

Recurring tools overlap, create manual work, or are difficult to evaluate as a total stack.

Inventory subscriptions and replacement costs, then recommend custom software only where the expected benefit justifies build and maintenance.

Starting condition

The current website platform creates measurable performance or maintenance constraints.

Map URLs, content, integrations, DNS, analytics, rollback needs, and platform costs before recommending optimization or migration.

Starting condition

Existing GoHighLevel workflows remain useful while the public website needs independent review.

Assess frontend performance and API compatibility, then document which CRM workflows can remain and which dependencies need changes.

Starting condition

Important content is difficult for search and answer systems to discover, interpret, or attribute.

Audit crawlability, entity clarity, structured data, answer formatting, and source quality; inclusion and citation remain controlled by third parties.

Starting condition

Operational data is fragmented across spreadsheets and tools without a reliable source of truth.

Map workflows, permissions, data sources, update frequency, and reporting needs before scoping a dashboard or integration.

From First Call to Launch.

Four reviewable stages, with the important decisions recorded before launch.

Step 01

Discovery

We inventory the current URLs, content, forms, analytics, integrations, and measurable baselines before recommending a migration scope.

migration inventory
URLs
Mapped
Content
Inventoried
Analytics
Baselined
Integrations
Reviewed
Risks and unknowns become written scope inputs
Step 02

Architecture

We document what should stay, move, integrate, or be replaced, along with dependencies, risks, acceptance criteria, and operating costs.

Current-stack decisions
• CMSKeep or migrate
• FormsRebuild or connect
• AnalyticsPreserve
• IntegrationsTest
→ Target architecture documentedReviewed
Step 03

Build

The new implementation is delivered in reviewable checkpoints so content, behavior, integrations, and edge cases can be validated before cutover.

Build checkpoints
Reviewable
FoundationEnvironment + structure
âś“
MigrationContent + features
âś“
QAReview + fixes
âś“
Step 04

Launch

Before cutover, we test redirects, forms, analytics, accessibility, metadata, monitoring, and the rollback path against the approved launch checklist.

Redirects
Checked
Old URL → target
Lead forms
Tested
Validation → delivery
Analytics and rollback planLaunch checklist

Tell us your current platform, primary risk, and target timeline.

AI + Engineers. Weeks, not months.

Senior engineers using AI tooling, on the schedule in your written terms. Not a guess, and not a junior learning on your budget.

A sequential build
6 phases, one after another
Work out what you need (2 weeks)
Wireframe it, then design it (3 weeks)
Build the front end (3 weeks)
Build the back end (2 weeks)
Test it (1 week)
Launch it (1 week)
How we run it
5 stages, several in parallel
Work out what you need, AI assisted (2 days)
Design it and prototype it (1 week)
Build it, AI assisted (1 to 2 weeks)
Run the automated tests (2 days)
Ship it (1 day)
Claude AI for architectureCursor for developmentAutomated testing pipelines

The left column is the shape of a phase-by-phase build, not a measured benchmark of any particular agency. Your schedule is the one written into the accepted project terms.

Model it on your own numbers

What could faster be worth to you?

Page speed and conversion rate are correlated across published retail research. This tool models what that relationship could be worth on your own numbers.

The calculation logic, stated openly

The model applies a flat 20% conversion-rate uplift to the traffic, conversion rate and order value youenter. That 20% is our own planning assumption, extrapolated from the Deloitte and Google “Milliseconds Make Millions” study (2020), which measured an 8.4% retail conversion lift from a 0.1s mobile improvement. It is not a measurement of your site and not a finding of that study.

Your actual result depends on your baseline speed, traffic mix, pricing, checkout and demand. Treat the output as an illustrative estimate for discussion, not a forecast, a promise, or a measured loss.

Revenue Recovery Calculator

50,000
5K500K
Modelled annual upside
$180,000
per year, estimated

Your inputs × a 20% conversion-uplift planning assumption. Extrapolated from Deloitte and Google, “Milliseconds Make Millions” (2020), which measured 8.4% retail conversion lift from a 0.1s mobile improvement. Not a measurement of your site.

Monthly revenue from the figures you entered$75,000
Modelled upside at a 20% conversion uplift$15,000/mo

Illustrative estimate based on your inputs and our stated 20% planning assumption. Not a measurement of your site, a forecast, or a promised result.

The Team

Founder-built, not farmed out.

When you book a call, Hassan answers. He writes every line of code. Imran leads the architecture. Contracts and support are US-based, and you get a founder on every project. No Manhattan office rent in your invoice, no account managers, no white-label outsourcing.

Hassan Jamal
Hassan Jamal
Co-founder & Lead Engineer

Builds the architectures. Writes the code. 900+ GitHub contributions this year across live client projects. Every commit is visible. US contracts and support. Senior engineering with direct founder access.

WordPress MigrationsE-Commerce BuildsSpeed OptimizationCustom Platforms
Imran Raza Ladhani
Imran Raza Ladhani
Co-founder & Lead Architect

Co-founded PandaCodeGen with Hassan and leads the architecture. He decides whether a migration is worth doing, designs how the pieces fit, and plans cutovers that do not take you offline. Hassan writes the code. Imran makes sure it scales.

Next.js ArchitecturePlatform MigrationsSystem DesignHeadless Commerce
The Engineering Standard

We are not a “Digital Agency.”

Agencies sell hours. We sell a working system. We stripped out the layers that make B2B projects run late.

Founders, Not Account Managers

You work directly with the co-founder engineer building your site, one dedicated point of contact from discovery to launch. No account managers, no ticket queues, no freelancers who vanish mid-project.

Zero Outsourcing

We don't outsource to offshore teams. Every line of code is written by our core engineers, the same people you speak to on the discovery call.

You Own The IP

We hand over the full source code on day one. We deploy to your hosting account, not ours. No monthly maintenance retainer required. You are in full control.

Ready to work with engineers, not account managers?

Book 30 minutes with an engineer. No sales pitch.

Tier Finder

Which tier is right for me?

Three questions and we will tell you which tier fits. No email needed.

Question 1 of 3

How many pages does your site have today?

FAQ

Common questions about migrating your platform

How much does WordPress to Next.js migration cost?

WordPress to Next.js migration starts at $1,500 for a 5 to 7 page business site (Starter), $3,500 for a 10 to 20 page site with blog migration and 301 redirects (Growth, most popular), and $5,000 to $10,000 for headless e-commerce with 30+ pages and custom integrations (Scale). Pricing is fixed for the scope written into the accepted project terms. We move your content, SEO settings and design to a custom coded site with no monthly plugin fees and no vendor lock in. Every plan carries a 90+ Lighthouse handover target on mobile and desktop for the agreed representative pages, verified across three recorded runs before handover.

How does the free AI website audit work?

The free audit analyses your website's load time, Core Web Vitals (the speed and stability signals Google reports), technical SEO and common security misconfigurations. Enter your URL and you get a breakdown of what the tests found, including your measured load time and Lighthouse performance score, plus specific recommendations. It runs in well under a minute and requires no signup. It is a point-in-time technical review, not a diagnosis of lost revenue.

How much faster will my site be after migrating from WordPress or Shopify?

It depends on your starting point, your templates and what runs on the page. Typical WordPress and Shopify sites we assess load in roughly 3 to 8 seconds; our builds target sub-second lab load times and a 90+ Lighthouse score on the agreed representative pages. What we commit to in writing is the handover target and the test conditions used to verify it, measured across three recorded runs on mobile and desktop. Field Core Web Vitals depend on your real traffic, devices and any third-party scripts added after launch, so those are monitored rather than promised.

Do you work with Shopify stores?

Yes. We build custom Shopify storefronts using headless architecture: your customers see a fast custom front end while you keep managing products and orders in Shopify as usual. If your store is slow because of app bloat, a heavy theme or unoptimised code, we replace the storefront layer with custom code while your entire Shopify backend stays in place for products, orders and payments. Speed improvement varies by store, so we measure your baseline before quoting.

Will I lose SEO rankings when migrating from WordPress?

No provider controls search rankings, so nobody can honestly guarantee they hold. What reduces avoidable risk is a documented process: a complete URL inventory, a one-to-one 301 redirect map, schema and metadata migration, sitemap regeneration, canonical consistency, a phased DNS cutover and Search Console monitoring afterwards. Your old site stays live until the new one is verified, and a rollback path is documented before cutover. Our MyCustomPatches migration is an owner-confirmed record: 22 days, rankings held, and hosting cost moved from $150/month to $0/month in the recorded period.

Why not just use a faster WordPress host or a caching plugin?

Faster hosting and caching help, but they do not change the underlying model: WordPress assembles each page on request by querying the database, loading plugins and rendering the theme. Caching plugins such as WP Rocket or W3 Total Cache put a static copy in front of that work, which helps until the cache misses, the page is personalised or a plugin update changes the output. A statically generated or server-rendered custom build removes the assembly step instead of hiding it, which is why the improvement holds up under load and after updates.