Skip to main content
PandaCodeGen

Project evidence

A case study should show the work, the proof, and the limits.

We label the source behind every result. Owner-confirmed project facts and first-party platform snapshots are not independent studies, ranking promises, or forecasts. Public reviews stay linked to their original source.

Owner-confirmed project fact
22 days

MyCustomPatches WordPress migration

Owner-confirmed July 21, 2026: approximately 3.2-second and 45 Mobile PageSpeed legacy baseline; 0.7-second lab result and 90+ Mobile PageSpeed after the rebuild; $150 legacy monthly hosting invoice versus a $0 hosting invoice in the recorded target period.
These are first-party project records, not an independent benchmark. Publish the original dated test profiles and invoice periods with any standalone comparison. Hosting eligibility and future cost are usage-dependent; no ranking or conversion result is implied.
Ownership disclosure
Founder-affiliated

Panda Patches

Panda Patches is owned and operated by Imran Raza Ladhani, a PandaCodeGen co-founder. PandaCodeGen built and maintains its technical platform. PandaCodeGen holds no ownership or partnership stake in the business. A June 2026 internal dashboard tagged more than $7,000 in orders as customer-reported AI-assisted referrals. A separate dated Meta Events Manager screenshot reported about 10.4% additional Lead events through Conversions API and displayed 9.0/10 Lead Event Match Quality.
Because the owner is a co-founder, treat this as a founder-affiliated project rather than an independent client engagement. These are first-party attribution and platform-reporting snapshots—not independent endorsements, controlled lift studies, guarantees, or forecasts. The AI referral tags are customer-reported.

Project records

The full write-ups, with their limits stated.

Each record states the relationship, the measurement conditions and what the figures do not prove. Two are founder-affiliated and labelled as such; they are operating experience, not independent client proof.

Independent client

MyCustomPatches

WordPress to Next.js migration. Owner-confirmed: 22 days, 3.2s to 0.7s, $150/mo to $0/mo hosting.

Founder-affiliated

Panda Patches

Headless Next.js, Sanity, Supabase and Square build with a real-time pricing calculator and ops platform.

Client project

Enterprise Operations

Custom operations platform: order tracking, role-based dashboards and reporting replacing spreadsheets.

Founder-affiliated

Panda CodeLab

Agency site build. Sub-second load times and an accessibility-first component system.

Evidence architecture

What each project record must contain.

Website migration

Scope record

URL and content inventory, redirect map, content model, integrations, analytics, cutover, monitoring, rollback, and handover.

Outcome evidence

Dated pre/post exports, representative URLs, test profile, Search Console comparison window, launch record, and known limitations.

Commerce replatforming

Scope record

Catalog, pricing, checkout, payments, customer accounts, analytics, consent, operations, platform trade-offs, and ongoing vendor costs.

Outcome evidence

Comparable cost periods, order and revenue definitions, attribution method, performance conditions, refund state, and owner permission.

Operations software

Scope record

Roles, workflows, data model, integrations, audit history, reporting, access control, backup, recovery, and support boundaries.

Outcome evidence

Approved requirements, acceptance record, role matrix, test evidence, incident history, measurement period, and authorized screenshots.

The publication gate.

  • Client or data-owner permission is recorded
  • Baseline and outcome use comparable conditions
  • Dates, sample, tools, and definitions are stated
  • Third-party costs include assumptions and exclusions
  • Testimonials match the approved original text
  • Rankings and revenue are not presented as guaranteed causation
  • Structured data does not exceed visible evidence
  • A review date and withdrawal trigger are assigned
Get your migration plan Review delivery standards