Skip to main content
PandaCodeGen

The anti-agency · Founded February 2026 · Co-founder led

Reduce migration risk before writing production code.

PandaCodeGen helps businesses plan and implement website migrations when URLs, content, integrations, measurement, and operational control matter. The work begins with evidence and a written scope, not an automatic promise that every site needs a rebuild.

You will not be handed to an account manager. The two founders who scope your project are the two engineers who build it, and if the evidence says repairing your current site is the better answer, we will tell you that instead of selling you a rebuild.

Review project evidence

Company facts

The people accountable for the work

Founded
February 2026
Mailing address
701 Tillery St Ste 12, Austin, TX 78702, United States

Delivery standard

What should be clear before approval

Migration continuity

The scope identifies current URLs, content, integrations, redirects, analytics, cutover responsibilities, and rollback conditions.

Written acceptance

Deliverables, exclusions, test pages, browser support, performance methodology, ownership, warranty, and remedies belong in the accepted written project terms.

Documented access and handover

Repository, hosting, domains, accounts, licenses, and handover timing are documented so control is not implied or left until launch.

Why clients choose us

What we will put in writing.

Not slogans. Each of these appears as a term in the accepted project terms, which is where you should hold us to them.

You own everything

Source code, design files, CMS models, documentation and production accounts are transferred to, or created under, your control. There is no proprietary layer you have to keep paying us for, and no scenario where leaving means starting over.

A measured speed target

A 90+ Lighthouse target on mobile and desktop, for representative pages named in your scope, verified across three recorded runs before handover. It is a lab acceptance test with stated conditions, not a promise about rankings, traffic or revenue, which nobody controls.

No platform rent

We do not charge a monthly licence to keep your own site running. You will still pay third parties for hosting, a CMS or email if your build uses them, and we document those costs and who owns each account before you approve anything.

Your exposure is capped at the deposit

Payment is normally 30% at onboarding and 70% at the delivery milestone, after you have reviewed the work. So you never pay the balance for something you have not accepted. Where scope protection is included in your accepted terms, we refund the fees paid under that scope if we fail to deliver what was promised, which at that point is the deposit. The terms define the trigger, verification and cure process. It is not a change-of-mind refund, and we would rather say that plainly than bury it.

Fixed price, no hourly billing

You approve a number before work starts, and that number holds for the agreed scope. Anything outside it is quoted and approved separately before it is built. A common structure is 30% at onboarding and 70% at the delivery milestone.

Support after launch

Discussions typically start at 15 business days for Starter and 30 for Growth and Scale. What it covers, when it starts, and what counts as a defect versus a new request are written down, so nobody argues about it later.

A launch you can reverse

Your current site stays live until you approve the new one. Redirects, analytics, forms, DNS, monitoring and a documented rollback path are agreed before cutover, so going live is a decision rather than a leap.

You talk to the engineers

Two co-founders scope your project and two co-founders build it. There is no account manager relaying messages, and no junior team you were not told about. If we think repairing your current site beats rebuilding it, you will hear that from the person who would have done the rebuild.

How the work is governed

Architecture and implementation stay connected to the commercial scope. If discovery shows that the current platform is the better option, the recommendation should say so.

  1. 1Review the current platform, URL set, content model, integrations, traffic profile, business goal, timeline, and budget range.
  2. 2Document assumptions, open questions, dependencies, exclusions, acceptance criteria, and third-party costs before implementation.
  3. 3Build and test representative templates, then validate redirects, forms, analytics, accessibility, and launch responsibilities.
  4. 4Cut over against a written checklist, retain a rollback path, and complete the evidence and handover defined in the accepted project terms.

Evidence policy

Claims need a date, method, and limitation.

Performance, cost, ranking, conversion, revenue, testimonial, and delivery figures should be published only with the source, measurement conditions, permission, and review date needed to interpret them. Search rankings, field performance, revenue, and AI citations remain controlled by external systems and are not guaranteed by a technical implementation.

  • Visible copy and structured data must agree
  • Lab results must name the tested profile
  • Third-party costs must include assumptions
  • Commercial remedies belong in accepted written project terms