Mutable facts
Anything that changes, prices, product limits, policies, market data, incidents, should cite a primary source and say when we checked it and which region, plan currency, or version.
Editorial governance
Editorial & Evidence Policy
We try to make it obvious which is which: a fact from someone else, something we saw ourselves, an estimate, an opinion, or a commercial term. A page is not evidence for its own claims, and a hyperlink alone is not a completed fact-check.
Effective: July 20, 2026 · Last reviewed: July 23, 2026
Publication controls
First-party results
A case-study number should say who it is about, over what period, where it was measured, what it started from, how it was measured, where it stops being reliable, and that we have permission to publish it. Results are not presented as typical or guaranteed.
Estimates and illustrations
Forecasts, example budgets and calculators are labelled as estimates, state what they assume, and are never presented as quotes or promises.
Search and performance
Lab tests are distinguished from field data. Search rankings, indexing, traffic, AI citations, PageSpeed scores under all conditions, conversions, and revenue are not guaranteed.
Comparisons
When we compare named companies we say how we picked them, where the information came from, when we checked, where the scope genuinely differs, and what PandaCodeGen's commercial interest in the comparison is.
Corrections
Material errors are corrected in the page and its metadata. A correction note should be added when the change affects the conclusion or a reader's commercial decision.
Review and freshness
High-volatility pages, including price trackers, product changes, incidents, legal or privacy topics, and current-year comparisons, require a primary-source check before publication and a scheduled recheck. Evergreen technical guidance is reviewed when a relevant platform, standard, or source changes. A visible date does not prove that every fact on a page is current.
Content review status
The July 2026 release review covered every current blog route and its shared search-card and FAQ data. Universal ranking, revenue, performance, hosting, cutover, ownership, refund, and AI-citation promises were removed or bounded, and a repository release gate now checks those prohibited patterns. Mutable vendor, product, price, incident, market, security, and legal facts still require a dated primary-source check whenever an article is materially updated. Readers should never treat an example as a PandaCodeGen quote, guarantee, or prediction for their project.
How this content is produced
Articles on this site are researched, drafted and edited by a named person with AI assistance, and every one carries a byline that resolves to that person's background page. AI tools are used the way a research assistant and a copy editor are used: to gather candidate sources, draft and restructure passages, and check prose for clarity. They are not used to publish unreviewed output, and no article is generated and posted without a human reading it in full.
Every factual claim, price, date, limit and quotation is verified against the primary source by a person before publication, and the date of that check is written into the page rather than implied by the timestamp. Where a figure cannot be verified against a primary source, we say so and leave it out rather than repeat it from a secondary summary. Where we publish an observation of our own, it carries the method and the date so a reader can repeat it. We disclose this because we recommend readers ask vendors the same question, and it would be inconsistent to ask it without answering it here.
Report a correction
Send the page URL, disputed statement, and supporting primary source to info@pandacodegen.com. We review corrections on their evidence, regardless of whether the sender is a customer, competitor, vendor, or reader.